Corona news flash | Litigation update no. 2 - M. Firon & Co. Advocates - Israel's Leading Law Firm
Back To All News & Innovations
19.03.2020

Corona news flash | Litigation update no. 2

  • Print

in light of the outbreak of the Coronavirus and in view of the Ministry of Health’s guidelines , the Chairman of the National Ethics Committee of the Israel Bar Association issued a guidelines on the subject of remote verification of affidavits.
Normally, an attorney who is verifying the signature on an affidavit must identify the declarant, ensure that the declarant has understood the affidavit, read the text of the warning to the declarant, in a language which he understands and ensure it has been understood. Such verification of the signature is to be performed in the presence of the lawyer.
Ethics Committees have previously held that remote verification via web camera or fax is not allowed.
In light of those decisions and in view of the current situation, a problem arises with regard to verifying affidavits, which – as stated – must be performed in the presence of a lawyer.
Accordingly, the Chairman of the Ethics Committee issued said guidance clarifying how a lawyer is to act when a potential declarant is prevented from signing an affidavit in accordance with Evidence Ordinance. According to the directive:
1. The document offered as a substitute affidavit will not be entitled an “affidavit” and a lawyer will not submit it as an “affidavit”, but rather as a “statement”, “notice” or similar such term.
2. At the bottom of the document, it should be noted that the signature has not been verified by a lawyer.
3. It should also be indicated in the document that prior to the hearing, a lawful affidavit will be submitted.
We are at your disposal for any questions you may have and wish you and all of us, good health.

in light of the outbreak of the Coronavirus and in view of the Ministry of Health’s guidelines , the Chairman of the National Ethics Committee of the Israel Bar Association issued a guidelines on the subject of remote verification of affidavits.
Normally, an attorney who is verifying the signature on an affidavit must identify the declarant, ensure that the declarant has understood the affidavit, read the text of the warning to the declarant, in a language which he understands and ensure it has been understood. Such verification of the signature is to be performed in the presence of the lawyer.
Ethics Committees have previously held that remote verification via web camera or fax is not allowed.
In light of those decisions and in view of the current situation, a problem arises with regard to verifying affidavits, which – as stated – must be performed in the presence of a lawyer.
Accordingly, the Chairman of the Ethics Committee issued said guidance clarifying how a lawyer is to act when a potential declarant is prevented from signing an affidavit in accordance with Evidence Ordinance. According to the directive:
1. The document offered as a substitute affidavit will not be entitled an “affidavit” and a lawyer will not submit it as an “affidavit”, but rather as a “statement”, “notice” or similar such term.
2. At the bottom of the document, it should be noted that the signature has not been verified by a lawyer.
3. It should also be indicated in the document that prior to the hearing, a lawful affidavit will be submitted.
We are at your disposal for any questions you may have and wish you and all of us, good health.

icons

12.09.2024

The Duns 100 Forum for senior executives in the legal field, specializing in commercial litigation

READ MORE
icons

24.09.2024

Children sued their mother in a family dispute over inheritance

READ MORE
icons

27.09.2024

Promotional financing offers for purchasing a home – a fly in the ointment?

READ MORE
icons

26.09.2024

Moral questions regarding AI and law

READ MORE
icons

27.08.2024

The conflict between creators and AI platforms is escalating

READ MORE
icons

23.08.2024

The court issued a stay of proceedings against Benny Landa’s diamond company for 14 days

READ MORE
icons

03.09.2024

Brokerage fees in the absence of a written agreement

READ MORE
icons

08.09.2024

The critical legal aspects that could lead to class action lawsuits and financial damages in the realms of e-commerce

READ MORE
icons

04.09.2024

The stay of proceedings order for Lusix has been extended until the end of September.

READ MORE
icons

02.09.2024

Shponder & Fadlon Group joins Av Gad holdings in an urban renewal project

READ MORE
icons

29.08.2024

Migdal Group Enters the Rental Housing Market

READ MORE
icons

22.08.2024

Client update – Privacy protection

READ MORE