The Supreme Court defines the tests for dividend distribution
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the District Court’s ruling in a derivative lawsuit and established that the criteria for distributing dividends is limited to an analysis of the financial statements from the previous two years. The Court determined that there is no justification for extending the legal language to incorporate information about anticipated losses that are not reflected in the financial reports. Advocates David Hamo and Keshet Lebel acted on behalf of Dolphin Investments, which holds a controlling interest in IDB, in the appeal.
For more details please see:
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the District Court’s ruling in a derivative lawsuit and established that the criteria for distributing dividends is limited to an analysis of the financial statements from the previous two years. The Court determined that there is no justification for extending the legal language to incorporate information about anticipated losses that are not reflected in the financial reports. Advocates David Hamo and Keshet Lebel acted on behalf of Dolphin Investments, which holds a controlling interest in IDB, in the appeal.
For more details please see:
19.06.2025
A building permit was approved for Av-Gad for a construction project in western Holon
READ MORE
25.06.2025
Our firm represents the petitioner in a petition against the Israel Land Authority concerning the marketing of land in Ganot
READ MORE
09.06.2025
“Public, Participation and Land: Urban Planning for the Arab Population in Israel” – a new book by Dr. Kais Nasser
READ MORE
27.05.2025
A lawsuit against Meta in the Tel Aviv District Court, alleging that the company enables the promotion of pirated content services on Facebook and Instagram
READ MORE
06.05.2025
The annulment of the judgment prevented the liquidation of the airline from Georgia
READ MORE
05.05.2025
