Corona news flash | Litigation update no. 2 - M. Firon & Co. Advocates - Israel's Leading Law Firm
Back To All News & Innovations
19.03.2020

Corona news flash | Litigation update no. 2

  • Print

in light of the outbreak of the Coronavirus and in view of the Ministry of Health’s guidelines , the Chairman of the National Ethics Committee of the Israel Bar Association issued a guidelines on the subject of remote verification of affidavits.
Normally, an attorney who is verifying the signature on an affidavit must identify the declarant, ensure that the declarant has understood the affidavit, read the text of the warning to the declarant, in a language which he understands and ensure it has been understood. Such verification of the signature is to be performed in the presence of the lawyer.
Ethics Committees have previously held that remote verification via web camera or fax is not allowed.
In light of those decisions and in view of the current situation, a problem arises with regard to verifying affidavits, which – as stated – must be performed in the presence of a lawyer.
Accordingly, the Chairman of the Ethics Committee issued said guidance clarifying how a lawyer is to act when a potential declarant is prevented from signing an affidavit in accordance with Evidence Ordinance. According to the directive:
1. The document offered as a substitute affidavit will not be entitled an “affidavit” and a lawyer will not submit it as an “affidavit”, but rather as a “statement”, “notice” or similar such term.
2. At the bottom of the document, it should be noted that the signature has not been verified by a lawyer.
3. It should also be indicated in the document that prior to the hearing, a lawful affidavit will be submitted.
We are at your disposal for any questions you may have and wish you and all of us, good health.

דמות מחזיקה מאזניים

in light of the outbreak of the Coronavirus and in view of the Ministry of Health’s guidelines , the Chairman of the National Ethics Committee of the Israel Bar Association issued a guidelines on the subject of remote verification of affidavits.
Normally, an attorney who is verifying the signature on an affidavit must identify the declarant, ensure that the declarant has understood the affidavit, read the text of the warning to the declarant, in a language which he understands and ensure it has been understood. Such verification of the signature is to be performed in the presence of the lawyer.
Ethics Committees have previously held that remote verification via web camera or fax is not allowed.
In light of those decisions and in view of the current situation, a problem arises with regard to verifying affidavits, which – as stated – must be performed in the presence of a lawyer.
Accordingly, the Chairman of the Ethics Committee issued said guidance clarifying how a lawyer is to act when a potential declarant is prevented from signing an affidavit in accordance with Evidence Ordinance. According to the directive:
1. The document offered as a substitute affidavit will not be entitled an “affidavit” and a lawyer will not submit it as an “affidavit”, but rather as a “statement”, “notice” or similar such term.
2. At the bottom of the document, it should be noted that the signature has not been verified by a lawyer.
3. It should also be indicated in the document that prior to the hearing, a lawful affidavit will be submitted.
We are at your disposal for any questions you may have and wish you and all of us, good health.

icons

24.07.2025

Petition to the High Court filed by our firm on behalf of Olympic sports associations

READ MORE
icons

11.07.2025

Class Action Motion Against Kal Gav Dismissed – Petitioner Ordered to Pay Costs

READ MORE
icons

13.07.2025

Client update – Labor Law

READ MORE
icons

17.07.2025

Mor Investment House Acquires 56% Stake in Techlend Financial Technologies

READ MORE
icons

11.06.2025

Legal Counsel to Natoon Group in the Sale of Controlling Stake to Brand Group in a Deal Valued at Approximately NIS 76 Million

READ MORE
icons

02.07.2025

Client update – Commercial Department

READ MORE
icons

07.07.2025

Client update – Litigation department

READ MORE
icons

07.07.2025

Client Update – M&A and International Corporate Commercial

READ MORE
icons

15.05.2025

Our firm represented the first AI company to go public on TASE

READ MORE
icons

18.06.2025

Client update – Administrative law

READ MORE
icons

19.06.2025

A building permit was approved for Av-Gad for a construction project in western Holon

READ MORE
icons

18.06.2025

Client update – Labor Law

READ MORE