Corona news flash | Litigation update no. 2 - M. Firon & Co. Advocates - Israel's Leading Law Firm
Back To All News & Innovations
19.03.2020

Corona news flash | Litigation update no. 2

  • Print

in light of the outbreak of the Coronavirus and in view of the Ministry of Health’s guidelines , the Chairman of the National Ethics Committee of the Israel Bar Association issued a guidelines on the subject of remote verification of affidavits.
Normally, an attorney who is verifying the signature on an affidavit must identify the declarant, ensure that the declarant has understood the affidavit, read the text of the warning to the declarant, in a language which he understands and ensure it has been understood. Such verification of the signature is to be performed in the presence of the lawyer.
Ethics Committees have previously held that remote verification via web camera or fax is not allowed.
In light of those decisions and in view of the current situation, a problem arises with regard to verifying affidavits, which – as stated – must be performed in the presence of a lawyer.
Accordingly, the Chairman of the Ethics Committee issued said guidance clarifying how a lawyer is to act when a potential declarant is prevented from signing an affidavit in accordance with Evidence Ordinance. According to the directive:
1. The document offered as a substitute affidavit will not be entitled an “affidavit” and a lawyer will not submit it as an “affidavit”, but rather as a “statement”, “notice” or similar such term.
2. At the bottom of the document, it should be noted that the signature has not been verified by a lawyer.
3. It should also be indicated in the document that prior to the hearing, a lawful affidavit will be submitted.
We are at your disposal for any questions you may have and wish you and all of us, good health.

דמות מחזיקה מאזניים

in light of the outbreak of the Coronavirus and in view of the Ministry of Health’s guidelines , the Chairman of the National Ethics Committee of the Israel Bar Association issued a guidelines on the subject of remote verification of affidavits.
Normally, an attorney who is verifying the signature on an affidavit must identify the declarant, ensure that the declarant has understood the affidavit, read the text of the warning to the declarant, in a language which he understands and ensure it has been understood. Such verification of the signature is to be performed in the presence of the lawyer.
Ethics Committees have previously held that remote verification via web camera or fax is not allowed.
In light of those decisions and in view of the current situation, a problem arises with regard to verifying affidavits, which – as stated – must be performed in the presence of a lawyer.
Accordingly, the Chairman of the Ethics Committee issued said guidance clarifying how a lawyer is to act when a potential declarant is prevented from signing an affidavit in accordance with Evidence Ordinance. According to the directive:
1. The document offered as a substitute affidavit will not be entitled an “affidavit” and a lawyer will not submit it as an “affidavit”, but rather as a “statement”, “notice” or similar such term.
2. At the bottom of the document, it should be noted that the signature has not been verified by a lawyer.
3. It should also be indicated in the document that prior to the hearing, a lawful affidavit will be submitted.
We are at your disposal for any questions you may have and wish you and all of us, good health.

icons

15.05.2025

The AI revolution requires a fundamental shift in the concept of privacy

READ MORE
icons

15.05.2025

Client update – Commercial dep

READ MORE
icons

06.05.2025

The annulment of the judgment prevented the liquidation of the airline from Georgia

READ MORE
icons

05.05.2025

The Kisu Group is selling 50% of its holdings in the restaurants to a group of senior investors

READ MORE
icons

30.03.2025

The Legal 500 ranking guide has recognized our firm as a leader in 22 practice areas, with 57 individual rankings

READ MORE
icons

29.04.2025

The Bar family, controlling shareholders of Tempo, acquired 30% of Bareli Group for over NIS 300 million

READ MORE
icons

11.04.2025

Client update – Competition and Antitrust

READ MORE
icons

07.04.2025

Shareholder Disputes: Why Advance Planning Is the Recipe for Success

READ MORE
icons

11.04.2025

Client update 1st Q – Litigation department

READ MORE
icons

11.04.2025

Client update 1st Q – Labor Law

READ MORE
icons

06.04.2025

The Price-Fixing Case: The Charges Against Diplomat Were Dropped

READ MORE
icons

08.04.2025

Does a preservation-designated building prevent urban renewal?

READ MORE