Client update |The validity of a general medical certificate issued to an employee who is in isolation under a National Health Order. | Adv. Tamar Golan - M. Firon & Co. Advocates -Israel's Leading Law Firm
Back To All News & Innovations
27.07.2020

Client update |The validity of a general medical certificate issued to an employee who is in isolation under a National Health Order. | Adv. Tamar Golan

  • Print

The Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice (HCJ), has issued its decision regarding the validity of a general medical certificate issued to an
employee who is in isolation under a National Health Order.

The HCJ has ruled that “statistical patients” who are in preventative isolation and are asymptomatic, do not suffer from an illness which prevents them from working, but rather are forcibly being prevented from performing their work by a government isolation order and not by illness, and therefore, the general medical certificate given in their regard does not amount to a “medical certificate” as defined in the Sickness Benefit Regulations and does not
entitle employees to sickness benefit under the Sickness Benefit Law, and is therefore invalidated.

Advocate Tamar Golan goes into the details of the decision and its implications.

For the full update (in Hebrew), please CLICK HERE

אנשים מושיטים ידיים למרכז

The Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice (HCJ), has issued its decision regarding the validity of a general medical certificate issued to an
employee who is in isolation under a National Health Order.

The HCJ has ruled that “statistical patients” who are in preventative isolation and are asymptomatic, do not suffer from an illness which prevents them from working, but rather are forcibly being prevented from performing their work by a government isolation order and not by illness, and therefore, the general medical certificate given in their regard does not amount to a “medical certificate” as defined in the Sickness Benefit Regulations and does not
entitle employees to sickness benefit under the Sickness Benefit Law, and is therefore invalidated.

Advocate Tamar Golan goes into the details of the decision and its implications.

For the full update (in Hebrew), please CLICK HERE

icons

27.07.2025

Clal Insurance to Invest NIS 250 Million in Bonei Hatichon

READ MORE

29.07.2025

Between a psychologist, a lawyer, and ChatGPT: Should conversations with AI be confidential?

READ MORE
icons

24.07.2025

Petition to the High Court filed by our firm on behalf of Olympic sports associations

READ MORE
icons

11.07.2025

Class Action Motion Against Kal Gav Dismissed – Petitioner Ordered to Pay Costs

READ MORE
icons

13.07.2025

Client update – Labor Law

READ MORE
icons

17.07.2025

Mor Investment House Acquires 56% Stake in Techlend Financial Technologies

READ MORE
icons

11.06.2025

Legal Counsel to Natoon Group in the Sale of Controlling Stake to Brand Group in a Deal Valued at Approximately NIS 76 Million

READ MORE
icons

02.07.2025

Client update – Commercial Department

READ MORE
icons

07.07.2025

Client update – Litigation department

READ MORE
icons

07.07.2025

Client Update – M&A and International Corporate Commercial

READ MORE
icons

15.05.2025

Our firm represented the first AI company to go public on TASE

READ MORE
icons

18.06.2025

Client update – Administrative law

READ MORE